Am_Fìobhach
Forum Member
 Joined: Wed 12 Nov 2008, 15:45 Posts: 4130 Location: Rìoghachd Fìobha
|
 Posted: Sat 08 May 2010, 00:14
BrianM, your assumptions about Scots are quite wrong. For instance, you're probably aware that no one party has achieved a majority of popular vote in the UK since WW2 (closest was Labour in 1951 - about 49.8% I think). You may not, though, be aware that one party DID get majority support in Scotland in 1955 (the last time it happened in Scotland) - and that party was the Conservative Party.
So, it would appear that, certainly 50 or so years ago, Scots tended to be marginally MORE Conservative than English. But you will also know, of course, that, to make broad generalisations to which there are obviously a few exceptions on both sides, Conservative supporters tend to be more oriented towards the individual, while Labour supporters are towards society. And, of course, one way in which "the individual" manifests itself is in the tendency to be more inward-looking than outward-looking. Hence, for instance, the greater measure of support in the Conservative ranks for such things as withdrawal from the EU and so on.
In the context of Scotland, "the individual" also finds another ready outlet, with the entity being Scotland itself. In effect, what has happened is that a large number of people who, put in and English setting, would be Conservative supporters are, in the Scottish setting, SNP supporters. It is, thus, almost certain that, in an English setting, Labour-held seats such as Edinburgh South, Ochil and Stirling would, this election, have returned Conservative MPs, as the combined Conservative and SNP vote in each is more than the Labour vote.
Also, over the years, the steady erosion of the Conservative heartlands by the Lib-Dems (as was also happening in large parts of SW England and Cornwall), coupled with the loss of the "traditional" Protestant vote for the Conservatives in the Glasgow area (now you know why Rangers play in blue), combined to significantly weaken Conservative presence in Scotland, so it could be that many Scots no longer felt the Conservatives to be a particularly credible choice. Add to that general decline the emergence of the SNP - with a spectacular by-election victory, seat taken from Labour, in Hamilton - and the Conservative fate in Scotland was secured: the mainstream right, by and large, now switched to the SNP.
So, those "die-hard" areas in the Highlands that the Liberals had been unable to take fell, in time, to the SNP.
Incidentally, I haven't yet added the figures in detail but I think you'll find that the total vote for Conservative plus SNP in Scotland is, indeed, more than the total vote for Labour. Indeed, there was a swing to Conservative in Scotland this time (and also, very marginally, to SNP), though I think there was also a swing to Labour (the Lib-Dems, as I thought would happen, were somewhat hammered in Scotland, though not enough to actually lose any of their entrenched seats).
On a brighter note (for you), the failure of the SNP to make any progress this time - especially if, at the UK level, the Conservatives can patch up some sort of a deal with what's left of the Lib-Dems - and the general dissatisfaction with the performance of the government in Holyrood - leaves the way wide open for a Conservative comeback in Scotland. For instance, if I were a Conservative straegist, I would now be looking at serious targetting of Perth, Banff & Buchan, Moray and Angus, as well as the usual Labour-held and Lib-Dem-held seats such as Stirling and Inverness.
|